Similarity Judgments: Philosophical, Psychological and Mathematical Investigations

Download
  1. (PDF, 265 KB)
AuthorSearch for: ; Search for:
TypeArticle
ConferenceLinguistic Distance Workshop at the International Committee on Computational Linguistics and the Association for Computational Linguistics (COLING/ACL 2006), July 17-21, 2006., Sydney, Australia
AbstractThis study investigates similarity judgments from two angles. First, we look at models suggested in the psychology and philosophy literature which capture the essence of concept similarity evaluation for humans. Second, we analyze the properties of many metrics which simulate such evaluation capabilities. The first angle reveals that non-experts can judge similarity and that their judgments need not be based on predefined traits. We use such conclusions to inform us on how gold standards for word sense disambiguation tasks could be established. From the second angle, we conclude that more attention should be paid to metric properties before assigning them to perform a particular task.
Publication date
LanguageEnglish
AffiliationNRC Institute for Information Technology; National Research Council Canada
Peer reviewedNo
NRC number48764
NPARC number5763284
Export citationExport as RIS
Report a correctionReport a correction
Record identifier583242c7-ab91-4835-ad33-57479e08293d
Record created2009-03-29
Record modified2016-05-09
Bookmark and share
  • Share this page with Facebook (Opens in a new window)
  • Share this page with Twitter (Opens in a new window)
  • Share this page with Google+ (Opens in a new window)
  • Share this page with Delicious (Opens in a new window)