Multi-scale investigation of the performance of limestone in concrete

  1. Available on January 1, 2017
  2. Get@NRC: Multi-scale investigation of the performance of limestone in concrete (Opens in a new window)
DOIResolve DOI:
AuthorSearch for: ; Search for: ; Search for: ; Search for: ; Search for: ; Search for: ; Search for: ; Search for: ; Search for: ; Search for:
Journal titleConstruction and Building Materials
Pages110; # of pages: 10
SubjectAggregates; Calcite; Calcium; Calcium carbonate; Calcium silicate; Carbonate minerals; Chemical bonds; Compressive strength; Concrete aggregates; Concretes; Crystal structure; Fly ash; Hydrates; Hydration; Particle size; Portland cement; Precipitation (chemical); Setting; Silicate minerals; Acceptable performance; Aragonite; Calcium silicate hydrate gel; Heat release; Interfacial transition zone; Ordinary Portland cement; Volume of limestone powders; Limestone
AbstractLimestone (calcium carbonate, CaCO3) has long been a critical component of concrete, whether as the primary raw material for cement production, a fine powder added to the binder component, or a source of fine and/or coarse aggregate. This paper focuses on the latter two of these examples, providing a multi-scale investigation of the influences of both fine limestone powder and conventional limestone aggregates on concrete performance. Fine limestone powder in the form of calcite provides a favorable surface for the nucleation and growth of calcium silicate hydrate gel at early ages, accelerating and amplifying silicate hydration, and a source of carbonate ions to participate in reactions with the aluminate phases present in the cement (and fly ash). Conversely, the aragonite polymorph of CaCO3 exhibits a different crystal (and surface) structure and therefore neither accelerates nor amplifies silicate hydration at a similar particle size/surface area. However, because these two forms of CaCO3 have similar solubilities in water, the aragonite does contribute to an enhancement in the reactivity of the aluminate phases in the investigated systems, chiefly via carboaluminate formation. In 100% ordinary Portland cement (OPC) concretes, 10% of the OPC by volume can be replaced with an equivalent volume of limestone powder, while maintaining acceptable performance. A comparison between limestone and siliceous aggregates indicates that the former often provide higher measured compressive strengths at equivalent levels of hydration, even when the two aggregate types exhibit similar elastic moduli. This suggests that the interfacial transition zone in the limestone-based concretes exhibits a higher degree of bonding, likely due to the favorable physical (texture) and chemical nature of the limestone surfaces. These observations reinforce the value of utilizing limestone to increase the performance and sustainability of 21st century concrete construction.
Publication date
AffiliationNational Research Council Canada; Construction
Peer reviewedYes
NRC numberNRC-CONST-56178
NPARC number21275626
Export citationExport as RIS
Report a correctionReport a correction
Record identifier62f7313f-d40b-4bc2-bcf6-826ad2fff3cf
Record created2015-07-14
Record modified2016-05-09
Bookmark and share
  • Share this page with Facebook (Opens in a new window)
  • Share this page with Twitter (Opens in a new window)
  • Share this page with Google+ (Opens in a new window)
  • Share this page with Delicious (Opens in a new window)