The Microstructure and optical transmittance thermal analysis of sodium borosilicate bio-glasses

  1. (PDF, 2 MB)
  2. Get@NRC: The Microstructure and optical transmittance thermal analysis of sodium borosilicate bio-glasses (Opens in a new window)
DOIResolve DOI:
AuthorSearch for: ; Search for: ; Search for: ; Search for: ; Search for:
Journal titleJournal of Thermal Analysis and Calorimetry
Pages145152; # of pages: 8
Subjectmicrostructure, optical microscopy, optical transmittance thermal analysis, SEM, sodium borosilicate bio-glasses
AbstractThe conditions to fabricate the bulk porous specimens have been studied in relation of sodium borosilicate (NBS) glasses. Glass composition, heat treatment at phase separation and TiO2 addition have been considered in this study. Original glass samples of composition in mol%: sample A: 9.19 Na2O ? 23.58 B2O3 ? 67.23 SiO2, sample B: 9.29 Na2O ? 3.17 TiO2 ? 23.82 B2O3 ? 63.72 SiO2 were prepared by melting reagent grade chemicals (Na2CO3, HBO3, SiO2 and AgNO3) in platinum crucibles at 1480°C for 1h in air. The melts were poured onto stainless steel plates and were annealed at 500°C for 0.5h after cooling. Thus, obtained samples were phase separated at 700°C for 2, 15, 25 and 50h to study their microstructure by scanning electron microscope (SEM). Besides the direct study of the microstructure by SEM, information on glass structural changes of samples are provided by measuring in situ changes by the optical transmittance thermal analysis. The isothermal measurements were carried out at 700, 720 and 740°C. The temperature of phase separation, the leaching and nucleator addition (TiO2), significantly influence the microstructure of the resulting leached product. TiO2 additive seems to suppress crystallization of cristobalite: especially at the extended above heat treatment phase separation runs. The phase-separated domains of glasses containing above 80 moles of SiO2 are so small that it is very hard to observe them by SEM. The glass composition in our case was selected in a way to have relatively large phase separated areas easily observed by SEM at magnification 20,000x. The influence of TiO2 is not too pronounced. It seems to suppress the cristobalite crystallization, especially of longer heating runs. The image analysis of leached glasses shows the prevailing content of the skeletal phase in a comparison to pores. The TiO2 content diminishes the content of the skeletal phase.
Publication date
AffiliationNRC Institute for Research in Construction; National Research Council Canada
Peer reviewedYes
NRC number47323
NPARC number20378249
Export citationExport as RIS
Report a correctionReport a correction
Record identifier88fdca7e-4977-440b-af3a-406797da23e8
Record created2012-07-24
Record modified2016-05-09
Bookmark and share
  • Share this page with Facebook (Opens in a new window)
  • Share this page with Twitter (Opens in a new window)
  • Share this page with Google+ (Opens in a new window)
  • Share this page with Delicious (Opens in a new window)