Effects of scalloping on the mixing mechanisms of forced mixers with highly swirling core flow

DOIResolve DOI: http://doi.org/10.1115/GT2012-70081
AuthorSearch for: ; Search for: ; Search for: ; Search for: ; Search for:
Proceedings titleProceedings of the ASME Turbo Expo 2012: Turbine Technical Conference and Exposition. Volume 1: Aircraft Engine; Ceramics; Coal, Biomass and Alternative Fuels; Controls, Diagnostics and Instrumentation
ConferenceASME Turbo Expo 2012: Turbine Technical Conference and Exposition, GT 2012, 11 June 2012 through 15 June 2012, Copenhagen
Pages437448; # of pages: 12
SubjectComputational investigation; Inlet swirls; Lower pressures; Mixing mechanisms; Reduced pressure; Separation bubble; Suction surfaces; Swirl angles; Computer simulation; Exhibitions; Gas turbines; Mixing; Molluscs; Vortex flow; Mixers (machinery)
AbstractThis paper presents a detailed experimental and computational investigation of the effects of scalloping on the mixing mechanisms of a scaled 12-lobe turbofan mixer. Scalloping was achieved by eliminating approximately 70% of the lobe sidewall area. Measurements were made downstream of the mixer in a co-annular wind tunnel and the simulations were carried out using an unstructured RANS solver, Numeca FINE/Hexa, with k-ω SST model. In the core flow, the swirl angle was varied from 0° to 30°. At high swirl angles, a three-dimensional separation bubble was formed on the lobe's suction surface penetration region and resulted in the generation of a vortex at the lobe valley. The valley vortex quickly dissipated downstream. Most of the swirl was removed by the lobes, but scalloping allowed residual swirl to persist downstream of the mixer. The interaction of the swirling flow and the vortices resulted in improved mixing rates for the scalloped mixer. Inlet swirl up to 10° provided improved mixing rates, reduced pressure loss and thrust loss for both mixers. High inlet swirl resulted in improved mixing but produced higher pressure and thrust losses as compared to the zero swirl case. At high swirl, the scalloped mixer resulted in better mixing and lower pressure losses than the unscalloped mixer, but at the expense of reduced thrust.
Publication date
AffiliationNational Research Council Canada (NRC-CNRC); Aerospace
Peer reviewedYes
NPARC number21270316
Export citationExport as RIS
Report a correctionReport a correction
Record identifier9e883250-4b17-4f36-8a5e-d6ccb2ee6d10
Record created2014-01-24
Record modified2016-05-09
Bookmark and share
  • Share this page with Facebook (Opens in a new window)
  • Share this page with Twitter (Opens in a new window)
  • Share this page with Google+ (Opens in a new window)
  • Share this page with Delicious (Opens in a new window)