State-of-the art comparability of corrected emission spectra.1. Spectral correction with physical transfer standards and spectral fluorescence standards by expert laboratories

Download
  1. (PDF, 3 MB)
  2. Get@NRC: State-of-the art comparability of corrected emission spectra.1. Spectral correction with physical transfer standards and spectral fluorescence standards by expert laboratories (Opens in a new window)
DOIResolve DOI: http://doi.org/10.1021/ac2034503
AuthorSearch for: ; Search for: ; Search for: ; Search for: ; Search for: ; Search for: ; Search for: ; Search for: ; Search for: ; Search for: ; Search for: ; Search for: ; Search for: ; Search for:
TypeArticle
Journal titleAnalytical Chemistry
Volume84
Issue9
Pages38893898; # of pages: 10
AbstractThe development of fluorescence applications in the life and material sciences has proceeded largely without sufficient concern for the measurement uncertainties related to the characterization of fluorescence instruments. In this first part of a two-part series on the state-of-the-art comparability of corrected emission spectra, four National Metrology Institutes active in high-precision steady-state fluorometry performed a first comparison of fluorescence measurement capabilities by evaluating physical transfer standard (PTS)-based and reference material (RM)-based calibration methods. To identify achievable comparability and sources of error in instrument calibration, the emission spectra of three test dyes in the wavelength region from 300 to 770 nm were corrected and compared using both calibration methods. The results, obtained for typical spectrofluorometric (0°/90° transmitting) and colorimetric (45°/0° front-face) measurement geometries, demonstrated a comparability of corrected emission spectra within a relative standard uncertainty of 4.2% for PTS- and 2.4% for RM-based spectral correction when measurements and calibrations were performed under identical conditions. Moreover, the emission spectra of RMs F001 to F005, certified by BAM, Federal Institute for Materials Research and Testing, were confirmed. These RMs were subsequently used for the assessment of the comparability of RM-based corrected emission spectra of field laboratories using common commercial spectrofluorometers and routine measurement conditions in part 2 of this series (subsequent paper in this issue).
Publication date
PublisherAmerican Chemical Society
LanguageEnglish
AffiliationMeasurement Science and Standards; NRC Institute for National Measurement Standards; National Research Council Canada
Peer reviewedYes
NPARC number21268133
Export citationExport as RIS
Report a correctionReport a correction
Record identifiere5a79d00-3eb4-4582-93ef-7b3733c89ffb
Record created2013-05-08
Record modified2016-05-09
Bookmark and share
  • Share this page with Facebook (Opens in a new window)
  • Share this page with Twitter (Opens in a new window)
  • Share this page with Google+ (Opens in a new window)
  • Share this page with Delicious (Opens in a new window)